.

Saturday, February 16, 2019

Personal Environmental Ethics :: essays research papers

There are some good deal who believe that the United States strictly forced endangered species laws seriously bail bond our economy. I on the other hand must dis take for. The endangered species laws were created for an pregnant reason to nurture our earths biological diversity. Whenever humanity interferes with the ecosystem for the purpose of economic outgrowth it tears it apart piece by piece. It is for reasons like these we must befool such tough laws, as in the Endangered Species Act. The fact of the bailiwick is that a problem still exists today. Many policy-makers and forest industry re expressatives present that the current forest and wildlife conditions constitute a "forest health crisis"(Peters, Frost, & amp Pace, 1999). The current crisis results from companies who tear down forests for their own profit. By doing this not only if is the forest itself being destroyed, but the wildlife within it. Furthermore, in 1990 the EPAs scientific seek team stated th at destruction of habitats, and species extinction are two of the four-spot most critical global environmental issues (Biodiversity, 1999).As can be seen, companies who destroy the ecosystem for economic invite are creating irreversible problems that future laws cannot correct. To continue further problems from occurring we must maintain all biodiversity laws. The basis of the laws are to protect all life, including all human life and are crucial for present and future generations (Biodiversity, 1999). The federal government has taken charge of this situation, most notably through its endangered species protection efforts (Biodiversity, 1999). This has become a controversial, but essential step in protection our ecosystem and all of the valuable resources it has to offer.Understanding those environmental issues are subjects of disagreement arising from different perspectives and values the controversy of economic gain verse ecological conservation is not easily settled. I protru de wildlife preservation only to prevent extinction. I believe without these laws that we as piece will suffer greatly, because we would be unable to reap the benefits of the ecosystem. I agree with the congressional findings that various species of fish, wildlife, and plants have been rendered extinct as a event of economic growth and development intemperate by adequate anguish and conservation (OLaughlin, 1998).

No comments:

Post a Comment